The Accidental TouristbyPaul ClarkWhen novelist Evan Connell was in high school, time and again he checked the same adventure novel out of the school library—The Aztec Treasure House by Thomas Janvier. The story concerned the exploits of a young American archeologist named Don Tomas and his companions, a Franciscan monk, two Otomi Indians, some soldiers of fortune, and a Mexican boy named Pablo, who join together to search for Aztec treasure. As an adult, Connell found a copy of the novel at a flea market. He hesitated buying it, assuming that his adult self would not enjoy the book as much as his teen-aged self. But, knowing he would likely never see it again, he bought it . . . and discovered that his first instinct was correct. It is the scientist, of course, armed with some impertinent facts, who attacks first—though the maneuver may be oblique or heavily veiled. Then the ecclesiastic must counterattack, for the very good reason that he perceives a threat to his office and to his life’s work. The status quo must be protected, the heretical march of knowledge obstructed, whether it be the development of anesthetics, the experiments of Galileo, or the deductions of infamous bulb-nosed naturalists.“Syllables Here and There” examines the origins of written language. Connell is equally fascinated with cultures that leave a written language, even if undecipherable, as those cultures who leave no record of a written language at all, or whose record was destroyed. Connell notes that what has been discovered written down in certain ancient civilizations are often mundane lists, invoices, really. For example, several thousand clay tablets dating to 1500 B.C. have been found in King Minos’ palace on the island of Crete. These tablets contain “list upon list of commodities. Figs. Olives. Tunics. Spices. Lamps. Helmets. Cauldrons. War Chariot. Goats.” Connell notes that anything of more historic interest that came from the court would have been written on expensive paper, which simply disappeared over time, while the invoices and lists were scratched on clay tablets that could be broken up and re-used or, as happened, buried to remain intact for centuries after the kingdom had disappeared. The villain of this essay is a Spanish priest named Diego de Landa who came to Mexico in 1549. Over the next several years he oversaw the destruction of innumerable pieces of Mayan art and literature. In one of history’s ironies, de Landa then wrote what is considered one of the best known contemporary histories of the Mayans. As Connell writes, “a man who did everything possible to annihilate their civilization is the man who preserved what little we know about it.” Three “painted books,” so called because of the elaborate hand-painted pages of these volumes, escaped de Landa’s burning frenzy. Although these books have only been partially translated, they contain mathematical and astronomical tables; dates of religious festivals and details of some religious ceremonies; and various prophecies. While these three books give some insight into the Mayan civilization, Connell cautions that “it is as if future historians of the English-speaking world were obliged to evaluate us on the basis of two prayer books and Pilgrim’s Progress.” In “Abracadastra” Connell charts the history of the discovery and examination of planets and movements of the solar system, from the first known astronomer, Thales, in Greece in 600 B.C. to the discovery of black holes. Connell is as interested in the scientists who got it right—Copernicus and Galileo get special scrutiny—as those who got it wrong, like the astronomer who first posited the existence of life on Mars or the one who, after close observation of the moon over 30 years, was convinced that there was industrial activity taking place there. Connell includes two more terrestrial essays in this book. In “Vinland Vínland” he provides a brisk look at the history of Norse voyages to North America, highlighting what we know and what we can only guess—did a Viking ship actually travel all the way to Mexico, as Connell slyly interprets the Mexican legend of Quetzacoatl? “The White Lantern” is about journeys to the South Pole. Connell contrasts the successful journeys of Roald Amundsen and the disastrous one of Robert Scott, who traveled to the Pole within six weeks of each other in 1912. In a quirk of history, Connell notes, “that Amundsen, the victor, is not as renowned as the loser. Quite a few people think that Scott was the first man to reach the South Pole. There is no logical explanation for the belief, though his dramatic death may account for it, together with the fact that he and his companions are still there-frozen like insects or splinters on the side of the great white lantern.” Connell presents history with a novelist’s hand. Although the stories are true and he provides a bibliography to guide the curious reader to more comprehensive biographies and histories, his style is that of an enthusiastic researcher, eager to share what he has learned through his own travels through libraries and through several countries. In 2001 the contents of both books were combined in a volume entitled, in a nod to Connell’s youthful reading adventure, The Aztec Treasure House. It comes highly recommended by this accidental tourist. Paul Clark is a writer in suburban Chicago. By day he edits a variety of print and online business and legal publications. By night, he sometimes writes for pleasure, though he keeps these writings under a bushel, and the bushel he keeps in a dark shed outdoors. Paul co-wrote a humor column called “Loose Canons” for the late, lamented Readerville Journal. He recently purged the majority of his books from his shelves. Over a series of essays, he will write about the books that remain and why they are important to him. He can be reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it |